Premium
Effects of rodeo® and garlon® 3A on nontarget wetland species in central Washington
Author(s) -
Gardner Susan C.,
Grue Christian E.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.5620150406
Subject(s) - invertebrate , biology , benthic zone , noxious weed , aquatic plant , wetland , ecology , macrophyte , weed
Purple loosestrife ( Lythrum salicaria ) is an invasive wetland perennial that became established in northeastern North America in the early 1800s. Despite its designation as a noxious weed, its distribution has continued to expand. Treatment with herbicides is the most widely used means of controlling purple loosestrife. This study examined the nontarget effects of two herbicides, Rodeo® and Garlon® 3A, currently used or being considered for use in controlling purple loosestrife in Washington State, respectively. Growth and/or survival of duckweed, Daphnia , and rainbow trout were monitored for at least 24 h following an application of each herbicide. Free‐living water column and benthic invertebrates were monitored 24 h and 7 d post‐spray using activity traps and sediment cores. Neither chemical was associated with significant decreases in survival or growth of the bioassay organisms, with the exception that growth of duckweed was reduced 48 h after exposure to Rodeo. Nor were significant decreases in the abundance of free‐living aquatic invertebrates detected following the herbicide applications. Results suggest that neither herbicide, at the application rates used, poses a hazard to aquatic invertebrates in wetlands in central Washington. However, Rodeo, because it is a broad‐spectrum herbicide, may pose a greater hazard to nontarget aquatic vegetation.