z-logo
Premium
Laboratory methods for volatile organic compounds evolved in mineralization studies
Author(s) -
Hickey William J.,
Arnold Scott M.,
Moran Bridget N.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.5620141103
Subject(s) - mineralization (soil science) , chemistry , environmental chemistry , trichloroethylene , volatile organic compound , charcoal , carbon black , activated carbon , activated charcoal , total organic carbon , organic chemistry , adsorption , nitrogen , natural rubber
A system to study mineralization of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was developed using commercially available solid‐phase VOC traps and impingers to collect CO 2 as well as VOCs breaking out from the solid‐phase trap. The efficiencies of VOC traps containing activated charcoal (AC) or graphitized carbon black (GCB) for absorbing [ 14 C]trichloroethylene ([ 14 C]TCE) and 14 CO 2 were evaluated, and approaches for minimizing VOC losses from reaction vessels were established. Mass balances showed AC and GCB absorbed similar amounts of [ 14 C]TCE. However, GCB had no detectable 14 CO 2 retention, whereas AC absorbed about 7% of the 14 CO 2 . Because 14 CO 2 absorption could influence the interpretation of mineralization experiments, GCB was concluded to be the better VOC‐trapping matrix.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here