z-logo
Premium
Development of formulated reference sediments for freshwater and estuarine sediment testing
Author(s) -
Suedel Burton C.,
Rodgers John H.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.5620130718
Subject(s) - hyalella azteca , daphnia magna , pimephales promelas , ceriodaphnia dubia , environmental chemistry , chironomus , cladocera , sediment , biology , estuary , chironomus riparius , ecotoxicology , branchiopoda , daphnia , ecology , amphipoda , crustacean , chironomidae , toxicity , fishery , chemistry , paleontology , organic chemistry , fish <actinopterygii> , larva , minnow
Sediments collected at various field locations may have chemical and physical constituents that influence test results and may contain organisms that cannot be readily removed. Thus, reference sediments are needed that can be formulated to match diverse freshwater and estuarine sediments encountered in comprehensive testing programs. This research evaluated formulated reference sediments in terms of (a) their ability to match field‐collected sediments both chemically and physically; (b) their suitability as habitat (survival and reproduction) for typical invertebrate toxicity testing species ( Hyalella azteca Saussure, Chironomus tentans Fabricius, and Daphnia magna Straus) during chronic exposures; and (c) their suitability as a substrate for Hyalella azteca, Chironomus tentans, Daphnia magna, Ceriodaphnia dubia Richard, and Pimephales promelas Rafinesque in 14‐d whole‐sediment exposures. Formulated reference sediments were prepared to match naturally occurring sediments with respect to particle‐size distribution, organic matter, organic carbon, pH, solids, CEC, but not redox potential. After preparation, a conditioning period of at least 7 d was required for pH stabilization of formulated reference sediments. In culture experiments, formulated reference sediment was suitable for Hyalella azteca, Chironomus tentans , and Daphnia magna survival and reproduction for 56, 40, and 28 d, respectively. Hyalella azteca, Chironomus tentans, Daphnia magna, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas survival was ≥88% in 14‐d exposures to formulated reference sediment. Formulated reference sediments may reduce some unexplained physical, chemical, or biological “toxicity” of field‐collected sediments (e.g., organic matter) that may influence toxicity testing results.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here