Premium
Application of sediment toxicity identification evaluation techniques to a site with multiple contaminants
Author(s) -
Bailey Howard C.,
Curran Catherine A.,
Arth Peter,
Lo Bonnie P.,
Gossett Rich
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.3488
Subject(s) - toxicity , environmental chemistry , contamination , chemistry , sediment , environmental science , biology , ecology , paleontology , organic chemistry
Sediment toxicity identification evaluations (TIEs) are conducted to determine causes of adverse effects observed in whole‐sediment toxicity tests. However, in multiple contaminant scenarios, it is problematic to partition contributions of individual contaminants to overall toxicity. Using data from a site with multiple inputs and contaminants of concern, the authors describe a quantitative approach for the TIE process by tracking toxicity units to determine whether all toxicity is accounted for. The initial step established the level of toxicity associated with the whole sediment and then partitioned sources of toxicity into general contaminant classes (e.g., ammonia, metals, nonpolar organic compounds). In this case, toxicity was largely the result of nonpolar organics, so the sediments were extracted and the extracts added back into dilution water and tested to confirm recovery of toxicity. Individual fractions were then generated using a solvent gradient and tested for toxicity. Fractions of interest were evaluated with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry to identify specific constituents associated with toxicity. Toxicity units associated with these constituents were then evaluated to determine probable associations with cause and whether all toxicity was accounted for. The data indicated that toxicity was associated with 2 contaminant classes, representing legacy compounds and contaminants of emerging concern, with the contribution of each varying across the site. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2456–2465. © 2016 SETAC