z-logo
Premium
Mercury and selenium accumulation in the Colorado River food web, Grand Canyon, USA
Author(s) -
Walters David M.,
RosiMarshall Emma,
Kennedy Theodore A.,
Cross Wyatt F.,
Baxter Colden V.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.3077
Subject(s) - biomagnification , bioaccumulation , canyon , trophic level , mercury (programming language) , environmental science , food web , wildlife , aquatic ecosystem , environmental chemistry , ecology , geography , biology , chemistry , cartography , computer science , programming language
Abstract Mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) biomagnify in aquatic food webs and are toxic to fish and wildlife. The authors measured Hg and Se in organic matter, invertebrates, and fishes in the Colorado River food web at sites spanning 387 river km downstream of Glen Canyon Dam (AZ, USA). Concentrations were relatively high among sites compared with other large rivers (mean wet wt for 6 fishes was 0.17–1.59 μg g –1 Hg and 1.35–2.65 μg g –1 Se), but consistent longitudinal patterns in Hg or Se concentrations relative to the dam were lacking. Mercury increased (slope = 0.147) with δ 15 N, a metric of trophic position, indicating biomagnification similar to that observed in other freshwater systems. Organisms regularly exceeded exposure risk thresholds for wildlife and humans (6–100% and 56–100% of samples for Hg and Se, respectfully, among risk thresholds). In the Colorado River, Grand Canyon, Hg and Se concentrations pose exposure risks for fish, wildlife, and humans, and the findings of the present study add to a growing body of evidence showing that remote ecosystems are vulnerable to long‐range transport and subsequent bioaccumulation of contaminants. Management of exposure risks in Grand Canyon will remain a challenge, as sources and transport mechanisms of Hg and Se extend far beyond park boundaries. Environ Toxicol Chem 2015;34:2385–2394. © 2015 SETAC

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here