z-logo
Premium
Current‐use pesticides in stream water and suspended particles following runoff: Exposure, effects, and mitigation requirements
Author(s) -
Bereswill Renja,
Streloke Martin,
Schulz Ralf
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1002/etc.2170
Subject(s) - environmental science , pesticide , riparian zone , buffer strip , riparian buffer , pyrethroid , surface runoff , water framework directive , environmental chemistry , hydrology (agriculture) , water quality , ecology , chemistry , biology , geotechnical engineering , habitat , engineering
Abstract The European Union's directive for sustainable use of pesticides requires implementing risk mitigation measures at streams threatened by pesticide entries. The need for mitigation measures was investigated at 10 stream sites within an intensively used arable region in central Germany by characterizing pesticide exposure following edge‐of‐field runoff and effects on the aquatic macroinvertebrates. Moreover, the influence of riparian buffer strip width (as a mitigation measure) at the sampling sites was considered. Generally, invertebrate fauna was dominated by pesticide‐tolerant species, suggesting a high pesticide exposure at almost all sites. This result is also reflected by the elevated levels of suspended particle contamination in terms of toxic units (logTU Max  > −2), corresponding to one‐hundredth of the median lethal concentration (LC50) to Daphnia magna . At two sites that received high aqueous‐phase entries of the pyrethroid lambda‐cyhalothrin (logTU Max  > −0.6), the abundance and number of sensitive species in terms of the species at risk index decreased during the pesticide application period. In contrast, no acute significant negative effects on macroinvertebrates were observed at sites characterised by low water‐phase toxicity (logTU Max  < –3.5). An influence of riparian buffer strip width on pesticide exposure was not observed, supposedly because of the presence of erosion rills and ephemeral ditches. In conclusion, results show that mitigation measures (such as the improvement of currently present riparian buffer strips) are needed in the study area. Environ Toxicol Chem 2013;32:1254–1263. © 2013 SETAC

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here