Premium
Twenty years of soil erosion on‐farm measurement: Annual variation, spatial distribution and the impact of conservation programmes for soil loss rates in Switzerland
Author(s) -
Prasuhn Volker
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
earth surface processes and landforms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.294
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1096-9837
pISSN - 0197-9337
DOI - 10.1002/esp.4829
Subject(s) - arable land , tillage , erosion , soil conservation , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , soil loss , geography , agriculture , agronomy , geology , geomorphology , geotechnical engineering , archaeology , biology
Long‐term field assessments of soil erosion on the landscape scale are very scarce. Such monitoring programmes create sound data regarding severity, extent, frequency and types of soil erosion and the vulnerability of particular crops. In a 20‐year monitoring programme between 1997 and 2017, accurate erosion damage mapping was carried out on 203 fields on arable land in the Canton of Berne (Switzerland). During 115 field inspections, 4060 field years and 2165 mapped erosion systems were recorded. Because several soil conservation programmes were implemented during this period, two 10‐year time periods (1st October 1997 to 30th September 2007 [P1] and 1st October 2007 to 30th September 2017 [P2]) were established and compared. The soil erosion rate was already low in P1 (mean: 0.74 t ha −1 year −1 ), but decreased significantly in P2 (mean: 0.20 t ha −1 year −1 ). During P1 and P2, respectively, 12 and 42% of the fields were without any visible erosion. Within 10 years, erosion occurred on each field on average 3.2 times in P1 and only 1.3 times in P2. Soil losses are spatially concentrated and linked to topographically defined pathways (thalwegs, slope depressions) or human‐made flow pathways (wheel tracks, tramlines, headlands). Financial incentives, rising awareness among farmers, innovative contractor farmers and good extension service of cantonal agencies helped conserve 85% of the arable land in the study area with conservation tillage methods by 2015. As a result, soil erosion was significantly reduced. The field‐based measurements show that a significant decrease in soil erosion is possible by changes in soil tillage practices and that erosion control is feasible almost everywhere under real‐life conditions on farmers’ fields. In this respect, the Frienisberg region is a case example of successful erosion control. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.