Premium
Comparison of taxon calibrations, modern analogue techniques, and forest‐stand simulation models for the quantitative reconstruction of past vegetation: A critique
Author(s) -
Solomon Allen M.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
earth surface processes and landforms
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.294
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1096-9837
pISSN - 0197-9337
DOI - 10.1002/esp.3290110612
Subject(s) - taxon , vegetation (pathology) , ecology , geography , physical geography , geology , paleontology , biology , medicine , pathology
Taxon calibrations based on eastern North America or on the southeastern United States alone suggest a different forest composition from that based on Wisconsin/Michigan, which is argued as preferable. Questions are raised about how well comparison with modern analogues distinguishes forest characteristics. The simulation model used by Delcourt and Delcourt is thought to be inappropriate, partly because it is constrained by faulty climatic data. Models are seen as complementary to other techniques rather than as an alternative methodology.