Premium
Do Restrictive and Bingeing/Purging Subtypes of Anorexia Nervosa Differ on Central Coherence and Set Shifting?
Author(s) -
Van Autreve Sara,
De Baene Wouter,
Baeken Chris,
Heeringen Cornelis,
Vervaet Myriam
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
european eating disorders review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.511
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1099-0968
pISSN - 1072-4133
DOI - 10.1002/erv.2233
Subject(s) - wisconsin card sorting test , anorexia nervosa , eating disorders , neuropsychology , psychology , cognitive flexibility , set (abstract data type) , cognition , coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) , trail making test , anorexia , clinical psychology , card sorting , psychiatry , developmental psychology , medicine , task (project management) , physics , management , quantum mechanics , computer science , economics , programming language
Objective Anorexia nervosa (AN) has been associated with weak central coherence (CC) and weak set shifting (SS). The main aim of this study was to examine possible differences between restrictive AN (AN‐R) and bingeing/purging AN (AN‐BP) on these features. Methods A total of 31 patients with AN‐R, 20 patients with AN‐BP and 26 healthy controls (HC) completed five neuropsychological tests (Block Design, Object Assembly, an adapted task‐switching paradigm, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and Trail Making Test). Results Using Block Design and Object Assembly, indicative for CC, AN‐R patients performed significantly worse than AN‐BP patients and HC, without any difference between AN‐BP and HC. On SS measures, no group differences were observed. Discussion The results suggest that cognitive profiles of AN‐R and AN‐BP patients differ significantly on CC and not on SS. Our current findings support the idea that the two subtypes of AN have a distinctive underlying nature and might need a different approach in cognitive remediation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.