Premium
Life cycle and life cycle cost implications of integrated phase change materials in office buildings
Author(s) -
Konstantinidou Christina A.,
Lang Werner,
Papadopoulos Agis M.,
Santamouris Mattheos
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
international journal of energy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.808
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1099-114X
pISSN - 0363-907X
DOI - 10.1002/er.4238
Subject(s) - life cycle assessment , building envelope , environmental impact assessment , work (physics) , engineering , life cycle cost analysis , environmental economics , reliability engineering , architectural engineering , production (economics) , operations management , operations research , thermal , mechanical engineering , economics , macroeconomics , ecology , physics , biology , meteorology
Summary The investigation of the use of phase change materials (PCM) in the building sector has become a significant issue and a field exhibiting significant potential in terms of research and development. The present study evaluates the integration of PCMs in office buildings on the basis of their economic and environmental performance by means of life cycle analysis (LCA) in conjunction with life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) respectively. This study is based on a previous building envelope multiobjective optimization study which considers cooling load requirements and thermal comfort conditions as optimization objectives. Specifically, this work moves 1 step further to evaluate the optimal results obtained from the above‐mentioned optimization study based on economic and environmental aspects. This paper attempts to evaluate and quantify the environmental and economic potential of PCM use in office buildings in a generic way. In detail, the present study starts by examining whether reducing the extent of the environmental impact achieved during the operational phase from energy savings offsets the respective increase arising from the PCM production. The LCA results reveal that the overall life cycle impact of the 2 office units examined is reduced, despite the respective impact of the construction stage increasing significantly, given the high proportion of impact accruing from the energy use stage in the overall impact. Finally, a life cycle cost evaluation assesses the viability of such applications, with the conclusion that the energy saving achieved during the use stage in both office units is insufficient to compensate for the LCC increase induced by the high cost of construction.