Premium
A system performance and economics analysis of IGCC with supercritical steam bottom cycle supplied with varying blends of coal and biomass feedstock
Author(s) -
Long Henry A.,
Wang Ting
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
international journal of energy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.808
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1099-114X
pISSN - 0363-907X
DOI - 10.1002/er.3022
Subject(s) - integrated gasification combined cycle , supercritical fluid , biomass (ecology) , coal , waste management , raw material , environmental science , capital cost , electricity generation , cost of electricity by source , rankine cycle , greenhouse gas , environmental engineering , pulp and paper industry , engineering , chemistry , agronomy , power (physics) , physics , organic chemistry , ecology , electrical engineering , quantum mechanics , biology
SUMMARY In recent years, Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Technology (IGCC) has been gaining popularity for use in clean coal power operations with carbon capture and sequestration. Great efforts have been continuously spent on investigating ways to improve the efficiency and further reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of such plants. This study focuses on investigating two approaches to achieve these goals. First, replace the traditional subcritical Rankine cycle portion of the overall plant with a supercritical steam cycle. Second, add biomass as co‐feedstock to reduce carbon footprint as well as SO x and NO x emissions. In fact, plants that use biomass alone can be carbon neutral and even become carbon negative if CO 2 is captured. Due to a limited supply of feedstock, biomass plants are usually small, which results in higher capital and production costs. In addition, biomass can only be obtained at specific times in the year, resulting in fairly low capacity factors. Considering these challenges, it is more economically attractive and less technically challenging to co‐gasify biomass wastes with coal. The results show that for supercritical IGCC, the net efficiency increases with increased biomass in all cases. For both subcritical and supercritical cases, the efficiency increases from 0% to 10% (wt.) biomass and decreases thereafter. However, the efficiency of the blended cases always remains higher than that of the pure‐coal baseline cases. The emissions (NO x , SO x , and effective CO 2 ) and the capital costs decrease as biomass ratio (BMR) increases, but the cost of electricity (CoE) increases with BMR due to the high cost of the biomass used. Finally, implementing a supercritical steam cycle is shown to increase the net plant output power by 13% and the thermal efficiency by about 1.6 percentage points (or 4.56%) with a 6.7% reduction in capital cost, and a 3.5% decrease in CoE. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.