Premium
A comparison of time‐domain transmitting boundaries
Author(s) -
Wolf John P.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
earthquake engineering and structural dynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.218
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1096-9845
pISSN - 0098-8847
DOI - 10.1002/eqe.4290140412
Subject(s) - boundary (topology) , extrapolation , superposition principle , time domain , mathematical analysis , mathematics , convolution (computer science) , boundary value problem , frequency domain , domain (mathematical analysis) , dispersion (optics) , physics , computer science , optics , machine learning , artificial neural network , computer vision
A non‐linear interaction analysis with a (generalized) non‐linear structure and a linear unbounded soil is analysed in the time domain, based either on the sub‐structure method, which involves global convolution integrals, or on the direct method with local boundary conditions. Alternatively, the hybrid frequency–time‐domain method of analysis, which is an iterative scheme, could be used. Approximate local boundary conditions to model the wave propagation towards infinity on the artificial boundary used in the direct method of non‐linear soil–structure‐interaction analysis to be performed in the time domain are examined. A semi‐infinite rod supported elastically, which exhibits the same properties as certain unbounded soils such as dispersion and a cut‐off frequency, is used for the investigation. For a transient excitation, the superposition boundary with frequent averaging, the well‐known viscous damper and the extrapolation algorithm lead to good accuracy. Moving the artificial boundary further away from the structure (or more precisely, increasing the ratio of the distance of the artificial boundary to the wave length) improves the accuracy.