Premium
Experimental seismic performance assessment and numerical modelling of nonlinear inerter vibration absorber (IVA)‐equipped base isolated structures tested on shaking table
Author(s) -
Pietrosanti Daniele,
De Angelis Maurizio,
Giaralis Agathoklis
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
earthquake engineering and structural dynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.218
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1096-9845
pISSN - 0098-8847
DOI - 10.1002/eqe.3469
Subject(s) - earthquake shaking table , nonlinear system , inertance , vibration , structural engineering , displacement (psychology) , acceleration , control theory (sociology) , acoustics , engineering , computer science , physics , mechanical engineering , tube (container) , psychology , control (management) , classical mechanics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , psychotherapist
In recent years, inerter vibration absorbers (IVAs), such as the tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI), attracted much attention in the literature for reducing seismic displacement demands of base isolated structures (BISs). Several theoretical studies reported reduced BIS seismic demands with increasing inertance endowed by a grounded inerter element, but adopted mostly idealized linear dynamical models. Herein, the potential of TMDI‐configured IVAs for seismic response reduction of BISs modelled as single‐mass structures is assessed under the combined effects of nonlinear inerter and structural behavior. To this aim, experimental data from a shaking table testing campaign are considered utilizing a custom‐built flywheel rack‐and‐pinion grounded inerter prototype with variable inertance, along with high damping rubber bearings in the isolation layer and in the BIS‐to‐absorber link. White noise excitation and an ensemble of six ground motions (GMs) with different frequency content are used in the tests for which bearings exhibit softening nonlinear behavior. Experimental results demonstrate improvement of BIS nonlinear seismic response in terms of displacement and base shear with increasing inertance for nonlinear and nonoptimally tuned IVAs. It is found though that the considered IVAs may be detrimental to BIS acceleration response depending on the GMs time‐varying frequency content signatures as captured by the continuous wavelet transform spectrogram. Finally, it is concluded that representing the inerter device by a simplified linear dissipative model as opposed to a nonlinear model with friction and gear backlash suffices to trace the BIS response with acceptable accuracy and, thus, can be used for optimal seismic TMDI design.