Premium
Nonlinear seismic behaviour of wall‐frame dual systems accounting for soil–structure interaction
Author(s) -
Carbonari Sandro,
Dezi Francesca,
Leoni Graziano
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
earthquake engineering and structural dynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.218
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1096-9845
pISSN - 0098-8847
DOI - 10.1002/eqe.1195
Subject(s) - soil structure interaction , nonlinear system , structural engineering , substructure , inertial frame of reference , pile , geotechnical engineering , seismic analysis , foundation (evidence) , dissipative system , engineering , frame (networking) , geology , finite element method , physics , telecommunications , archaeology , quantum mechanics , history
SUMMARY The aim of this paper is to study the effects of soil–structure interaction on the seismic response of coupled wall‐frame structures on pile foundations designed according to modern seismic provisions. The analysis methodology based on the substructure method is recalled focusing on the modelling of pile group foundations. The nonlinear inertial interaction analysis is performed in the time domain by using a finite element model of the superstructure. Suitable lumped parameter models are implemented to reproduce the frequency‐dependent compliance of the soil‐foundation systems. The effects of soil–structure interaction are evaluated by considering a realistic case study consisting of a 6‐storey 4‐bay wall‐frame structure founded on piles. Different two‐layered soil deposits are investigated by varying the layer thicknesses and properties. Artificial earthquakes are employed to simulate the earthquake input. Comparisons of the results obtained considering compliant base and fixed base models are presented by addressing the effects of soil–structure interaction on displacements, base shears, and ductility demand. The evolution of dissipative mechanisms and the relevant redistribution of shear between the wall and the frame are investigated by considering earthquakes with increasing intensity. Effects on the foundations are also shown by pointing out the importance of both kinematic and inertial interaction. Finally, the response of the structure to some real near‐fault records is studied. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.