Premium
Comparative response assessment of minimally compliant low‐rise conventional and base‐isolated steel frames
Author(s) -
Erduran Emrah,
Dao Nhan D.,
Ryan Keri L.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
earthquake engineering and structural dynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.218
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1096-9845
pISSN - 0098-8847
DOI - 10.1002/eqe.1078
Subject(s) - structural engineering , base isolation , engineering , response analysis , displacement (psychology) , frame (networking) , incremental dynamic analysis , seismic analysis , steel frame , seismic hazard , civil engineering , mechanical engineering , psychology , psychotherapist
In this study, the multi‐intensity seismic response of code‐designed conventional and base‐isolated steel frame buildings is evaluated using nonlinear response history analysis. The results of hazard and structural response analysis for three‐story braced‐frame buildings are presented in this paper. Three‐dimensional models for both buildings are created and seismic response is assessed for three scenario earthquakes. The response history analysis results indicate that the design objectives are met and the performance of the isolated building is superior to the conventional building in the design event. For the Maximum Considered Earthquake, isolation leads to reductions in story drifts and floor accelerations relative to the conventional building. However, the extremely high displacement demands of the isolation system could not be accommodated under normal circumstances, and creative approaches should be developed to control displacements in the MCE. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.