Premium
Potable water production using two solar stills having different cover materials and fabrication costs
Author(s) -
Riahi Ali,
Wan Yusof Khamaruzaman,
Isa Mohamed Hasnain,
Singh Mahinder Singh Balbir,
Mustaffa Zahiraniza,
Ahsan Amimul,
Ul Mustafa Muhammad Raza,
Sapari Nasiman,
Zahari Noor Atieya Munni
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
environmental progress and sustainable energy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.495
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1944-7450
pISSN - 1944-7442
DOI - 10.1002/ep.12718
Subject(s) - solar still , environmental engineering , fabrication , environmental science , solar energy , cover (algebra) , process engineering , materials science , pulp and paper industry , engineering , mechanical engineering , desalination , electrical engineering , membrane , medicine , genetics , alternative medicine , pathology , biology
Solar stills are very cost‐effective technologies used in producing potable water. This work aims to investigate the productivity of two passive double sloped solar stills fabricated with different cover materials with similar shapes; polythene film (PSS) and glass (GSS). The first solar still was made of a transparent polythene film, PVC pipes and a black painted stainless steel trough as cover, frame and basin, respectively. The second one was fabricated using glass as cover, with similar basin material. Experimental outputs indicated that GSS had 1%–5% higher yield than PSS throughout the experiment. The fabrication cost of PSS was 5 times less than the cost of the GSS. The thermal energy efficiencies of PSS and GSS were obtained as 34.05% and 35.50%, respectively. A mathematical model for each solar still was developed using the relationships of heat and mass transfer and their calculated and experimental productivities were in good agreement. Water quality parameters tested showed that water produced from both solar stills met the WHO standards for drinking purposes. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 37: 584–596, 2018