z-logo
Premium
Spatiotemporal reconstructions of global CO 2 ‐fluxes using Gaussian Markov random fields
Author(s) -
Dahlén Unn,
Lindström Johan,
Scholze Marko
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
environmetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.68
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1099-095X
pISSN - 1180-4009
DOI - 10.1002/env.2610
Subject(s) - covariance , covariance function , flux (metallurgy) , eddy covariance , statistical physics , gaussian process , gaussian , autoregressive model , representation (politics) , matérn covariance function , inverse problem , kriging , environmental science , mathematics , statistics , physics , mathematical analysis , covariance intersection , chemistry , ecology , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , ecosystem , politics , political science , law , biology
Atmospheric inverse modeling is a method for reconstructing historical fluxes of green‐house gas between land and atmosphere, using observed atmospheric concentrations and an atmospheric tracer transport model. The small number of observed atmospheric concentrations in relation to the number of unknown flux components makes the inverse problem ill‐conditioned, and assumptions on the fluxes are needed to constrain the solution. A common practice is to model the fluxes using latent Gaussian fields with a mean structure based on estimated fluxes from combinations of process modeling (natural fluxes) and statistical bookkeeping (anthropogenic emissions). Here, we reconstruct global CO 2 flux fields by modeling fluxes using Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRFs), resulting in a flexible and computational beneficial model with a Matérn‐like spatial covariance and a temporal covariance arriving from an autoregressive model in time domain. In contrast to previous inversions, the flux is defined on a spatially continuous domain, and the traditionally discrete flux representation is replaced by integrated fluxes at the resolution specified by the transport model. This formulation removes aggregation errors in the flux covariance, due to the traditional representation of area integrals by fluxes at discrete points, and provides a model closer resembling real‐life space–time continuous fluxes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here