Premium
Boosting the Performance of Solid‐State Lithium Battery Based on Hybridizing Micron‐Sized LATP in a PEO/PVDF‐HFP Heterogeneous Polymer Matrix
Author(s) -
Xue Xilai,
Zhang Xiangxin,
Liu Yongchuan,
Chen Sujing,
Chen Yuanqiang,
Lin Junhong,
Zhang Yining
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
energy technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.91
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 2194-4296
pISSN - 2194-4288
DOI - 10.1002/ente.202000444
Subject(s) - electrolyte , materials science , crystallinity , ionic conductivity , electrochemistry , chemical engineering , ethylene oxide , lithium (medication) , oxide , polymer , electrochemical window , electrode , chemistry , composite material , copolymer , medicine , engineering , metallurgy , endocrinology
Solid‐state poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) electrolyte exhibits a low ionic conductivity at ambient conditions, and large interfacial resistance between PEO and electrodes obstructs its applications in lithium metal batteries. Heterogeneous solid electrolytes (HSEs) are an alluring solution for the exploitation of PEO. Herein, PEO/poly(vinylidene fluoride‐co‐hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF‐HFP)/micron‐sized Li 1.4 Al 0.4 Ti 1.6 (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP) heterogeneous solid electrolytes are originally prepared to decrease the crystallinity of PEO and interfacial resistance between HSEs and electrodes. Heterogeneous solid electrolyte composed of PEO/PVDF‐HFP/5% micron‐sized LATP (PPL‐5) exhibits superior electrochemical properties in ionic conductivity (3.01 × 10 −5 S cm −1 ), lithium transference number (0.55) at 30 °C, and a broad potential window (5.31 V). Li/PPL‐5/Li symmetric cell displays a relatively stable potential response during 800 h cycling, authenticating long‐term compatibility between the as‐prepared electrolyte and lithium metal. LiFePO 4 (LFP) is used as a cathode to test the chemical and electrochemical stability of PPL‐5. The discharge capacity of LFP/PPL‐5/Li coin cell maintains 97.9 mAh g −1 at 0.8 C after 500 cycles with capacity retention of 86.7%. Such excellent performance of PPL‐5 can be ascribed to the reduction of crystallinity of PEO and the improvement of the interfacial contact between electrolyte and electrodes, when PVDF‐HFP and micron‐sized LATP are simultaneously incorporated with PEO electrolyte.