English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Objectives  Assess the impact of an electronic health record (EHR)‐embedded clinical pathway (ePATH) as compared to a paper‐based clinical decision support tool on outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS).    Methods  A retrospective, quasi‐experimental study using difference‐in‐differences and interrupted time series specifications to evaluate the impact of an EHR‐embedded clinical pathway between April 2013 and July 2017. The intervention was implemented in February 2016 at a large academic tertiary hospital and compared to a local community hospital without the intervention. Eligible patients included adults (>18 years) presenting to the ED with chest pain who had a troponin ordered within 2 hours of arrival and a chest pain‐related diagnosis. Patients with initial evidence of acute myocardial infarction were excluded. Primary outcomes included rates of admission and stress testing, hospital length of stay, and occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.    Results  On average, there were 170 chest pain visits per month at the intervention site. The frequency of hospital admission (unadjusted 28.2% to 20.9%,  P  < 0.001) and stress testing (unadjusted 15.8% to 12.7%,  P  < 0.001) significantly declined after ePATH implementation. After comparison with the comparator site, ePATH was still associated with a significant reduction in hospital admissions (‐10.79%,  P  < 0.001) and stress testing (‐6.05%,  P  < 0.001). Hospital length of stay and rates of major adverse cardiac events did not significantly change.    Conclusions  Implementation of ePATH for patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was associated with safe reductions in hospital admission and stress testing. ePATH appears to be an effective tool for implementing evidence‐based guidelines for ED patients with chest pain.

journal of the american college of emergency physicians open

Reduced admission rates and resource utilization for chest pain patients using an electronic health record‐embedded clinical pathway in the emergency department