Premium
Cytosine arabinoside enhancement of gamma irradiation induced mutations in human t‐lymphocytes
Author(s) -
O'Neill J. P.,
Sullivan L. M.,
Hunter T. C.,
Nicklas J. A.,
Landolph J. R.,
Hoffman G. R.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
environmental and molecular mutagenesis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1098-2280
pISSN - 0893-6692
DOI - 10.1002/em.2850170403
Subject(s) - cytosine , gamma irradiation , mutagen , mutation , irradiation , biology , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics , dna , cancer research , chemistry , gene , physics , nuclear physics
The frequency of 6‐thioguanine resistant (TG r ) mutants induced in human G 0 phase T‐lymphocytes by 200 cGy of gamma irradiation is greatly enhanced by incubation with cytosine arabinoside (ara‐C) after irradiation. The mutant frequency increased with increasing incubation time in ara‐C for up to 2 hr. This mutation induction required a phenotypic expression time of 5–8 days mass culture growth, similar to that found with mutants induced by 300 cGy of irradiation alone. Southern blot analysis of 40 isolated mutant clones revealed 8 independent mutations by T‐cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement patterns. Four of these eight showed hprt gene structural alterations (0.50). An alternative method to allow phenotypic expression was developed to minimize the isolation of hprt /TCR sibling mutants. The use of in situ expression in the microtiter dish wells resulted in the isolation of 17 independent mutations in 19 mutant clones. Ten of these 17 mutations showed hprt structural alterations (0.59). The high fraction of mutations involving structural alterations detected by Southern blot analysis is consistent with the known induction of chromosome aberrations by irradiation plus ara‐C treatment. We propose that both the increase in Mf and the increase in the incidence of hprt gene structural alterations are due to the accumulation of strand breaks in repairing regions of DNA under these conditions of ara‐C induced inhibition of repair. We further propose that upon release of the ara‐C inhibition, these repairing regions can interact to yield both gene mutations and chromosome aberrations.