Open AccessA shortcut method for evaluation of protein deposition onto the membrane surface in crossflow ultrafiltration
Author(s) -
Muca Renata,
Piątkowski Wojciech,
Antos Dorota
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
engineering in life sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.547
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1618-2863
pISSN - 1618-0240
DOI - 10.1002/elsc.201500159
Subject(s) - ultrafiltration (renal) , chemistry , adsorption , chromatography , protein adsorption , membrane , lysozyme , aqueous solution , concentration polarization , cross flow filtration , size exclusion chromatography , deposition (geology) , yield (engineering) , protein purification , chemical engineering , materials science , biochemistry , organic chemistry , paleontology , sediment , engineering , metallurgy , biology , enzyme
In this study, a procedure for quantifying the surface deposition of proteins in crossflow ultrafiltration has been developed. The procedure consists of determining the protein adsorption behavior onto the membrane surface from a few dynamic measurements performed in a nonfiltration and a filtration mode, and evaluating the concentration polarization (CP) layer thickness based on the adsorption data. To predict the interdependence between the protein adsorption and CP, a simplified mathematical model has been formulated. The model was used to assess the protein adsorption and thus yield reduction in the ultrafiltration process at different protein concentration in the solution. As a case study, ultrafiltration of aqueous solutions of BSA and lysozyme (LYZ) was examined on a polyethersulfone membrane with the molecular weight cutoff of 10 or 100 kDa. The protein concentration in the solutions varied within a relatively low concentration range, i.e. below 10 mg mL −1 , characteristic for solvent exchange between sequential operations of protein purification by chromatography and extraction. Both proteins markedly differed in the mechanism of surface deposition; for BSA hydrophobic interactions were suggested to be dominant, whereas in case of LYZ electrostatic interactions contributed the most to the deposition mechanism. The effect of additives of the protein solutions, i.e. inorganic salts, PEG, and urea depended on the adsorption mechanism and was also specific for each protein. Nevertheless, the proposed procedure performed well in the evaluation of surface deposition and yield reduction, regardless of the protein type and its solvent environment.