z-logo
Premium
Integrated massively parallel sequencing of 15 autosomal STRs and Amelogenin using a simplified library preparation approach
Author(s) -
Xue Jian,
Wu Riga,
Pan Yajiao,
Wang Shunxia,
Qu Baowang,
Qin Ying,
Shi Yuequn,
Zhang Chuchu,
Li Ran,
Zhang Liyan,
Zhou Cheng,
Sun Hongyu
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
electrophoresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1522-2683
pISSN - 0173-0835
DOI - 10.1002/elps.201700429
Subject(s) - massive parallel sequencing , ion semiconductor sequencing , microsatellite , genotyping , typing , str analysis , biology , genetics , computational biology , amelogenin , dna sequencing , dna , microbiology and biotechnology , genotype , allele , gene
Abstract Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies, also termed as next‐generation sequencing (NGS), are becoming increasingly popular in study of short tandem repeats (STR). However, current library preparation methods are usually based on ligation or two‐round PCR that requires more steps, making it time‐consuming (about 2 days), laborious and expensive. In this study, a 16‐plex STR typing system was designed with fusion primer strategy based on the Ion Torrent S5 XL platform which could effectively resolve the above challenges for forensic DNA database‐type samples (bloodstains, saliva stains, etc.). The efficiency of this system was tested in 253 Han Chinese participants. The libraries were prepared without DNA isolation and adapter ligation, and the whole process only required approximately 5 h. The proportion of thoroughly genotyped samples in which all the 16 loci were successfully genotyped was 86% (220/256). Of the samples, 99.7% showed 100% concordance between NGS‐based STR typing and capillary electrophoresis (CE)‐based STR typing. The inconsistency might have been caused by off‐ladder alleles and mutations in primer binding sites. Overall, this panel enabled the large‐scale genotyping of the DNA samples with controlled quality and quantity because it is a simple, operation‐friendly process flow that saves labor, time and costs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here