z-logo
Premium
Investigation of the pH gradient formation and cathodic drift in microchip isoelectric focusing with imaged UV detection
Author(s) -
Xu Zhongqi,
Okabe Noboru,
Arai Akihiro,
Hirokawa Takeshi
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
electrophoresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1522-2683
pISSN - 0173-0835
DOI - 10.1002/elps.201000395
Subject(s) - chemistry , isoelectric focusing , cathodic protection , analytical chemistry (journal) , electrolyte , cathode , anode , electrophoresis , chromatography , coating , electrode , biochemistry , organic chemistry , enzyme
This paper reports the protein analysis by using microchip IEF carried on an automated chip system. We herein focused on two important topics of microchip IEF, the pH gradient and cathodic drift. The computer simulation clarified that the EOF could delay the establishment of pH gradient and move the carrier ampholytes (CAs) to cathode, which probably caused a cathodic drift to happen. After focusing, the peak positions of components in a calibration kit with broad p I were plotted against their p I values to know the actual pH gradient in a microchannel varying time. It was found that the formed pH gradient was stable, not decayed after readily steady state, and migrated to cathode at a rate of 10.0 μm/s that determined by the experimental conditions such as chip material, internal surface coating and field strength. The theoretical pH gradient was parallel with the actual pH gradient, which was demonstrated in two types of microchip with different channel lengths. No compression of pH gradient was observed when 2% w/v hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose was added in sample and electrolytes. The effect of CAs concentration on current and cathodic drift was also explored. With the current automatic chip system, the calculated peak capacity was 23–48, and the minimal p I difference was 0.20–0.42 for the used single channel microchip with the effective length of 40.5 mm. The LOD for the analysis of CA‐I and CA‐II was around 0.32 μg/mL by using normal imaged UV detection, the detected amount is ca . 0.07 ng.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here