z-logo
Premium
Detection of polymerase chain reaction fragments using a conducting polymer‐modified screen‐printed electrode in a microfluidic device
Author(s) -
Shiddiky Muhammad J. A.,
Park DeogSu,
Shim YoonBo
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
electrophoresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1522-2683
pISSN - 0173-0835
DOI - 10.1002/elps.200500447
Subject(s) - electrode , detection limit , microfluidics , materials science , capillary action , reproducibility , analytical chemistry (journal) , capillary electrophoresis , matrix (chemical analysis) , polymer , chromatography , chemistry , nanotechnology , composite material
Abstract A simple and fast method for electrochemical detection of amplified fragments by PCR was successfully developed using CE in a microfluidic device with a modified screen‐printed carbon electrode (SPCE). The surfaces of the SPCE were modified with poly‐5,2'‐5',2''‐terthiophene‐3'‐carboxylic acid, which improves the analysis performance by lowering the detection potential, enhancing the S/N characteristics, and avoiding electrode poisoning. DNA fragments amplified by PCR were separated within 210 s in a 75.5 mm‐long coated‐separation channel at a separation field strength of −200 V/cm. To minimize the sample adsorption into the inner surface of the capillary wall, which disturbs the separation, a dynamically coated capillary with an acrylamide solution was used. Furthermore, the analysis procedure was simplified and rendered reproducible by using 0.50% w/v hydroxyethylcellulose as a separation matrix in a coated channel. The reproducibility of the analysis employing the coated channel yielded RSD of 4.3% for the peak areas and 1.4% for the migration times in eight repetitive measurements at a modified electrode, compared with 21.3 and 9.4% for a bare electrode. The sensitivity of the assay was 18.74 pAs/(pg/μL) with a detection limit of 584.31 ± 1.3 fg/μL.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here