Premium
Determination of multiple drugs of abuse in human urine using capillary electrophoresis with fluorescence detection
Author(s) -
Alnajjar Ahmed,
Butcher Jared A.,
McCord Bruce
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
electrophoresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.666
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1522-2683
pISSN - 0173-0835
DOI - 10.1002/elps.200305847
Subject(s) - capillary electrophoresis , derivatization , chromatography , chemistry , fluorescence , detection limit , laser induced fluorescence , fluorescence spectroscopy , reproducibility , analytical chemistry (journal) , mass spectrometry , physics , quantum mechanics
Methods for separation and determination of multiple drugs of abuse in biological fluids using capillary electrophoresis (CE) with native fluorescence and laser‐induced fluorescence (LIF) detection are described herein. Using native fluorescence, normorphine, morphine, 6‐acetyl morphine (6‐AM), and codeine were analyzed by CE without any derivatization procedure and detected at an excitation wavelength of 245 nm with a cut‐off emission filter of 320 nm, providing a rapid and simple analysis. The detection limits were in the range of 200 ng/mL. For a highly sensitive analysis, LIF detection was also examined using a two‐step precolumn derivatization procedure. In this case, drugs extracted from human urine were first subjected to an N ‐demethylation reaction involving the use of 1‐chloroethyl chloroformate (ACE‐Cl) and then derivatized using fluorescein isothiocyanate isomer I (FITC) and analyzed by CE coupled to a LIF detector. Variables affecting this derivatization: yield of demethylation reaction, FITC concentration, reaction time and temperature, were studied. The estimated instrumental detection limits of the FITC derivatives were in the range of 50–100 pg/mL, using LIF detection with excitation and emission wavelengths of 488 nm and 520 nm, respectively. The linearity, reproducibility and reliability of the methods were evaluated. In addition, a comparison of the characteristics for both native fluorescence and LIF detections was also discussed.