Premium
Moral relevance varies due to inter‐individual and intra‐individual differences across big data technology domains
Author(s) -
Kodapanakkal Rabia I.,
Brandt Mark J.,
Kogler Christoph,
Beest Ilja
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
european journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.609
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1099-0992
pISSN - 0046-2772
DOI - 10.1002/ejsp.2814
Subject(s) - psychology , variation (astronomy) , relevance (law) , social psychology , intuition , anger , cognition , faith , epistemology , cognitive science , philosophy , physics , neuroscience , astrophysics , political science , law
Theories of moralization argue that moral relevance varies due to inter‐individual differences, domain differences, or a mix of both. Predictors associated with these sources of variation have been studied in isolation to assess their unique contribution to moralization. Across three studies ( N Study1 = 376; N Study2a = 621; N Study2b = 589), assessing attitudes towards new big data technologies, we found that moralization is best explained by theories focusing on inter‐individual variation (∼29%) and intra‐individual variation across technology domains (∼49%), and less by theories focusing on differences between technology domains (∼6%). We simultaneously examined 15 inter‐individual and 16 intra‐individual predictors that potentially explain this variation. Predictors directly relevant to the technologies (e.g., justice concerns), cognitive styles (e.g., faith in intuition), and emotional reactions (e.g., anger) best explain variation in moral relevance. Accordingly, scholars should simultaneously adopt and adapt moralization theories related to inter‐individual and intra‐individual differences across domains rather than in isolation.