Premium
Discharged and dismissed: A qualitative study with back pain patients discharged without treatment from orthopaedic consultations
Author(s) -
BraeuningerWeimer Kathrin,
Anjarwalla Naffis,
Pincus Tamar
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
european journal of pain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.305
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1532-2149
pISSN - 1090-3801
DOI - 10.1002/ejp.1412
Subject(s) - medicine , feeling , empathy , worry , distress , active listening , physical therapy , qualitative research , back pain , distraction , low back pain , anger , health care , anxiety , alternative medicine , psychology , psychiatry , clinical psychology , psychotherapist , social psychology , social science , neuroscience , sociology , economics , economic growth , pathology
Background Consultation‐based reassurance for patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care has been shown to be associated with patients' outcomes. Little is known about the role of reassurance in people with LBP consulting with orthopaedic spinal care teams. Reassurance may be important, especially in cases where surgery is not indicated and patients are discharged without treatment. Methods Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 30 patients with chronic disabling musculoskeletal LBP who had recently consulted with spinal orthopaedic care teams. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed. Results Most patients reported feeling dismissed and discouraged. Patients perceived that they needed specific behaviours from practitioners in order to feel sufficiently reassured to commit to self‐management. These behaviours group into four domains: “Knowing my whole story” (evidence that practitioners read the case notes; were familiar with the patients' previous health care history; carried out tests and a physical examination and gathered information about the patients' lifestyle), “Seeing the right person” (showing empathy; listening; building rapport and demonstrating that they are qualified and experienced), “Nothing to worry about” (reducing generic reassuring statements but increasing validating statements recognizing suffering) and “Getting to grips with my problem” (providing explanations and a clear management plan). In the absence of these behaviours, patients rejected advice to self‐manage, reported distress, anger and intention to re‐consult. Conclusion Effective communication with patients attending spinal orthopaedic care settings is important, especially when no active treatment is being offered. Significance This study describes narratives from patients discharged without surgery following consultations with orthopaedic professionals for persistent and debilitating lower back pain. Findings suggest that these interactions are distressful to patients, and that patients require comprehensive and specific reassurance to promote self‐management. The findings contribute a unique insight into the special needs of people with complex pain problems and provide guidance to improve consultation‐based reassurance in orthopaedic spinal care settings.