Premium
Differential effect of Incobotulinumtoxin A on pain, neurogenic flare and hyperalgesia in human surrogate models of neurogenic pain
Author(s) -
Diener S.A.,
Breimhorst M.,
Vogt Th.,
Krämer H.H.,
Drummond P.D.,
Geber C.,
Birklein F.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
european journal of pain
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.305
H-Index - 109
eISSN - 1532-2149
pISSN - 1090-3801
DOI - 10.1002/ejp.1031
Subject(s) - capsaicin , medicine , intradermal injection , anesthesia , hyperalgesia , stimulation , nociception , receptor , immunology
Background The effectiveness of Botulinum‐neurotoxin A (Bo NT /A) to treat pain in human pain models is very divergent. This study was conducted to clarify if the pain models or the route of Bo NT /A application might be responsible for these divergent findings. Methods Sixteen healthy subjects (8 males, mean age 27 ± 5 years) were included in a first set of experiments consisting of three visits: (1) Visit: Quantitative sensory testing ( QST ) was performed before and after intradermal capsaicin injection ( CAPS , 15 μg) on one thigh and electrical current stimulation ( ES , 1 Hz) on the contralateral thigh. During stimulation pain and the neurogenic flare response (laser‐Doppler imaging) were assessed. (2) Four weeks later, Bo NT /A (Xeomin ® , 25 MU ) was injected intracutaneously on both sides. (3) Seven days later, the area of Bo NT /A application was determined by the iodine‐starch staining and the procedure of the (1) visit was exactly repeated. In consequence of these results, 8 healthy subjects (4 males, mean age 26 ± 3 years) were included into a second set of experiments. The experimental setting was exactly the same with the exception that stimulation frequency of ES was increased to 4 Hz and Bo NT /A was injected subcutaneously into the thigh, which was stimulated by capsaicin. Results Bo NT /A reduced the 1 Hz ES flare size ( p < 0.001) and pain ratings ( p < 0.01), but had no effect on 4 Hz ES and capsaicin‐induced pain, hyperalgesia, or flare size, regardless of the depth of Bo NT /A injection (i.c./s.c). Moreover, i.c. Bo NT /A injection significantly increased warm detection and heat pain thresholds in naive skin ( WDT , Δ 2.2 °C, p < 0.001; HPT Δ 1.8 °C, p < 0.005). Conclusion Bo NT /A has a moderate inhibitory effect on peptidergic and thermal C‐fibers in healthy human skin. Significance The study demonstrates that Bo NT /A (Incobotulinumtoxin A) has differential effects in human pain models: It reduces the neurogenic flare and had a moderate analgesic effects in low frequency but not high frequency current stimulation of cutaneous afferent fibers at C‐fiber strength; Bo NT /A had no effect in capsaicin‐induced ( CAPS ) neurogenic flare or pain, or on hyperalgesia to mechanical or heat stimuli in both pain models. Intracutaneous Bo NT /A increases warm and heat pain thresholds on naïve skin.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom