z-logo
Premium
Deprotonation, Chloride Abstraction, and Dehydrohalogenation as Synthetic Routes to Bis‐Pyrazolate Pyridyl Iron(II) Complexes
Author(s) -
Cook Brian J.,
Polezhaev Alexander V.,
Chen ChunHsing,
Pink Maren,
Caulton Kenneth G.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.201700558
Subject(s) - chemistry , dehydrohalogenation , deprotonation , diamagnetism , dimer , medicinal chemistry , reactivity (psychology) , chloride , paramagnetism , crystallography , stereochemistry , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry , ion , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , catalysis , physics , quantum mechanics , magnetic field
The process of removal of protons and chloride, dehydrohalogenation, from [(H 2 L)FeCl 2 ] is investigated systematically, to understand the reactivity of the implied transient LFe II . Reaction of [(H 2 L)FeCl 2 ] with 2 equiv. of LiN(SiMe 3 ) 2 yields the “‐ate” complex LiClFe 2 L 2 , as its dimer with every iron five‐coordinate in an FeN 4 Cl environment. To avoid Li + cation derived from LiN(SiMe 3 ) 2 , reaction of Na 2 L with FeCl 2 gives a product from addition of water, paramagnetic Na 2 [NaFe(HL)(L)] 2 (LFeO), which reveals Na/pyrazolate Nβ interactions and a five coordinate oxo group in the OFe 3 Na 2 core of this aggregate. Abstraction of chloride in [(H 2 L)FeCl 2 ] with NaBArF 4 in THF gives paramagnetic [(H 2 L)Fe(THF) 3 ] 2+ , which fails to react with CO. Dehydrohalogenation in the presence of Ph 2 PC 2 H 4 PPh 2 , dppe, gives both [LFe(κ 2 ‐dppe)] 2 (µ‐dppe)] and [LFe(κ 2 ‐dppe)(κ 1 ‐dppe)], diamagnetic saturated species, which can be separated by pentane extraction. Dehydrohalogenation in the presence of t BuNC gives diamagnetic [LFe(CN t Bu) 3 ]. This is selectively methylated at both pyrazolate β‐nitrogen atom to give [L Me Fe( t BuNC) 3 ] 2+ which shows rich cyclic voltammetry, and which is reduced, with KC 8 , to diamagnetic [L Me Fe( t BuNC) 2 ]. Structure determination of some of these, together with IR data on isocyanide stretching frequencies, show L 2– to be a stronger donor than L Me . First installing triflate (to avoid the more persistent chloride ligand) facilitates access to [LFe(Lewis base) 3 ] 2+ complexes, but this cation still shows relatively weak binding of CO to LFe II , which implicates weak π basicity of that d 6 species. Production of paramagnetic bis ‐pincer complexes [(H 2 L) 2 Fe] 2+ and [(L Me ) 2 Fe] 2+ in the presence of abundant Lewis base in polar medium is demonstrated, which illustrates a pincer ligand redistribution challenge to be kept in mind when trying to maintain a 1:1 Fe:pincer ratio, for highest reactivity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom