z-logo
Premium
Switching the Macrocycle Conformation from Nonplanar to Planar in Cobalt(II) and Copper(II) β‐Tetra‐2′‐thienyl‐ meso ‐tetraphenylporphyrin Cocrystallates with C 60
Author(s) -
Bhyrappa Puttaiah,
Sarangi Ujwal K.,
Varghese Babu
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.201402763
Subject(s) - tetraphenylporphyrin , chemistry , porphyrin , crystallography , copper , crystal structure , cobalt , supramolecular chemistry , crystal (programming language) , tetra , intermolecular force , pyrrole , corrole , ring (chemistry) , photochemistry , molecule , medicinal chemistry , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry , computer science , programming language
Crystal structures of cobalt(II) and copper(II) complexes of 2,3,12,13‐tetra‐2′‐thienyl‐5,10,15,20‐tetraphenylporphyrin/C 60 cocrystallates were determined by single‐crystal XRD analysis. The crystal structures of the two cocrystallates, MTPP(2′‐thienyl) 4 · C 60 · (toluene) 2 (M = Co II and Cu II ; TPP = tetraphenylporphyrin), compounds 1 and 2 , respectively, are isomorphous and reveal a one‐dimensional (1D) supramolecular structure. In these cocrystallates, the macrocycle is almost planar within ±0.08 Å, as evidenced by comparing the value of Δ C b (the average deviation of the β‐pyrrole carbon from the porphyrin ring mean plane) with those for the nonplanar parent structures, CoTPP(2′‐thienyl) 4 [±0.710(5) Å] and CuTPP(2′‐thienyl) 4 [±0.546(2) Å]. This difference has been ascribed to intermolecular interactions and/or crystal packing forces.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom