z-logo
Premium
Magnetic and Sorption Properties of Supramolecular Systems Based on Pentanuclear Copper(II) 12‐Metallacrown‐4 Complexes and Isomeric Phthalates: Structural Modeling of the Different Stages of Alcohol Sorption
Author(s) -
Pavlishchuk Anna V.,
Kolotilov Sergey V.,
Zeller Matthias,
Shvets Oleksiy V.,
Fritsky Igor O.,
Lofland Samuel E.,
Addison Anthony W.,
Hunter Allen D.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.201100790
Subject(s) - chemistry , sorption , methanol , supramolecular chemistry , perchlorate , solvent , molecule , inorganic chemistry , alcohol , crystal structure , copper , crystallography , organic chemistry , ion , adsorption
Metathesis of the perchlorate anions in [Cu 5 (ahpha) 4 ](ClO 4 ) 2 · 4H 2 O, where ahpha 2– is the dianion of 3‐amino‐3‐hydroximinopropane hydroxamic acid, with m ‐ and p ‐phthalates resulted in formation of [Cu 5 (ahpha) 4 ( m ‐C 8 H 4 O 4 )(H 2 O)] · 9H 2 O ( 1 ), [Cu 5 (ahpha) 4 ( m ‐C 8 H 4 O 4 )(H 2 O)] · 2MeOH · DMF ( 1a ) and [Cu 5 (ahpha) 4 ( p ‐C 8 H 4 O 4 )(H 2 O) 2 ] 2 · 14H 2 O ( 2 ). Molecules in the structures of 1 , 1a and 2 are held together by noncovalent interactions, and the lattices contain voids filled with water molecules. Compounds 1 and 1a differ in the mode of m ‐phthalate coordination, solvent type, and crystal lattice content. Desolvated 1 and 2 sorb gaseous MeOH and EtOH. Whereas the MeOH sorption capacity was very similar for 1 and 2 (about 0.14 cm 3 /g at PP S –1 = 0.9, where P is the current methanol pressure and P S the saturation vapor pressure of methanol at 293 K), the capacity of 2 to sorb EtOH was about 1.5 times as high as that of 1 . To a certain extent, the structures of 1 and 1a can be considered as models of compounds that can form at different stages during alcohol sorption by desolvated 1 . The χ M T vs. T data for 1 and 2 could be fitted with a model based on the Hamiltonian H (Cu II 5 ) = –2 J 1 (S 1 · S 2 + S 1 · S 3 + S 1 · S 4 + S 1 · S 5 ) – 2 J 2 (S 2 · S 5 + S 2 · S 3 + S 3 · S 4 + S 4 · S 5 ), where S 1 represents the spins of the central Cu II ions and S 2 –S 4 correspond to the spins of the peripheral Cu II ions. The best fits corresponded to J 1 = –129(3) cm –1 , J 2 = –66(1) cm –1 and zJ′ = –2.5(2) cm –1 at g Cu = 2.12(1) for 1 , and J 1 = –163(3) cm –1 , J 2 = –78(1) cm –1 and zJ′ = –1.5(1) cm –1 at g Cu = 2.05(1) for 2 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom