z-logo
Premium
Tris(2,6‐diisopropylphenolato)titanium(IV) Dihydridodiorganylborates: Synthesis and Structures
Author(s) -
Knizek Jörg,
Nöth Heinrich
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.201001108
Subject(s) - chemistry , titanium , agostic interaction , diborane , tris , medicinal chemistry , metal , borane , potassium , chloride , boranes , boron , inorganic chemistry , organic chemistry , catalysis , biochemistry
The reactions of tris(2,6‐diisopropylphenolato)titanium(IV) chloride with alkali‐metal dihydridodiorganylborates M(H 2 BR 2 ) (M = Li, K; R = Me, C 6 H 11 , CMe 3 ; BR 2 = BC 5 H 10 , BC 8 H 14 ) led to the corresponding titanium dihydridodiorganylborates. However, in almost all cases byproducts such as (2,6‐diisopropylphenolato)diorganylboranes, triorganylboranes, diorganylboranes, diborane and tetrakis(2,6‐diisopropylphenolato)titanium(IV) were also generated. (2,6‐ i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 O) 3 Ti(H 2 BR 2 ) compounds also resulted from the interaction of methyltris(2,6‐diisopropylphenolato)titanium, for example, with catecholborane. In addition to the formation of tris(2,6‐diisopropylphenolato)catecholboratotitanium(IV), B ‐methylcatecholborane was also formed The reaction of potassium dihydro‐9‐cyclooctylborate with 2,6‐bis(2,2‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐2‐hydroxyethyl)pyridinetitanium dichloride (LTiCl 2 ) led to the complex LTi(H 2 BC 8 H 14 ) 2 . This compound showed no agostic C–H ··· Ti interaction in contrast to (2,6‐ i Pr 2 C 6 H 3 O) 3 TiH 2 BC 8 H 14 and the corresponding titanium dihydridobis(cyclohexyl)borate.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom