Premium
Efficient Removal of Anionic Surfactants Using Mesoporous Functionalised Hybrid Materials
Author(s) -
Coll Carmen,
MartínezMáñez Ramón,
Marcos M. Dolores,
Sancenón Felix,
Soto Juan,
Mahajan Rakesh Kumar
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.200900391
Subject(s) - chemistry , adsorption , pulmonary surfactant , mesoporous material , pyridine , langmuir adsorption model , protonation , inorganic chemistry , langmuir , amine gas treating , chloride , organic chemistry , ion , catalysis , biochemistry
A new hybrid system for surfactant removal from water has been developed using mesoporous material (MCM‐41) functionalised with suitable binding groups. Solid S1 , S2 and S3 were prepared by reaction of the mesoporous material with N ‐methyl‐ N′ ‐(propyltrimethoxysilyl)imidazolium chloride, (3‐aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane or 4‐[(triethoxysilylpropylthio)methyl]pyridine, respectively. The functionalised materials were characterised following standard solid‐state techniques. The final prepared solids consist of a siliceous MCM‐41‐type mesoporous support with the surface decorated by imidazolium, amine and pyridine binding groups suitable for anion coordination. Equilibrium adsorption studies of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate (LAS) using S1 , S2 and S3 in water have been carried out. The obtained adsorption data were correlated with a Langmuir isotherm model that gives an acceptable description of the experimental data. The maximum surfactant uptake/binding site (mol mol –1 ) and the surfactant adsorption capacity (mmol g –1 ) for materials S1 , S2 and S3 were calculated. S1 shows a positive‐charged functionalised surface that is independent of the pH of the solution, whereas S2 and S3 are functionalised with neutral groups that need to be protonated in order to display electrostatic binding interactions with the anionic surfactants. Therefore, whereas the adsorption capacity of S1 is pH‐independent, S2 and S3 display larger LAS adsorption at acidic pH. The adsorption ability at a certain pH follows the order S1 >> S3 > S2 . A remarkable maximum surfactant adsorption of 1.5 mmol per gram of material was observed for S1 at neutral pH. S2 and S3 behave as poorer adsorbents and show maximum surfactant adsorption of 0.197 and 0.335 mmol per gram of material, respectively, at pH 2.(© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2009)