z-logo
Premium
Theoretical Studies on [Ru(bpy) 2 (NN)] 2+ [NN = Hydrazone and Azine]: Ground‐ and Excited‐State Geometries, Electronic Structures, Absorptions, and Phosphorescence Mechanisms
Author(s) -
Liu Tao,
Zhang HongXing,
Zhou Xin,
Xia BaoHui
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.200701011
Subject(s) - excited state , azine , phosphorescence , chemistry , ruthenium , ground state , bipyridine , photochemistry , hydrazone , molecular electronic transition , crystallography , atomic physics , fluorescence , crystal structure , stereochemistry , catalysis , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
The ground‐ and excited‐state geometries, electronic structures, absorptions, and emissions of two ruthenium(II) complexes Ru(bpy) 2 (NN) [bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine, NN = hydrazone ( 1 ) and azine ( 2 )] were investigated theoretically. Their ground and the excited state geometries were fully optimized at the B3LYP/MP2/LANL2DZ and UB3LYP/UMP2/LANL2DZ levels, respectively, and the calculated geometries are consistent with the X‐ray results. At the TD‐DFT level with the PCM model, the absorptions and phosphorescence properties of 1 and 2 were calculated on the basis of the optimized ground‐ and excited‐state geometries, respectively. Thecalculated lowest‐lying absorptions of 1 (512 nm) and 2 (598 nm) are attributed to a {[d   x   2 – y   2(Ru) + d xy (Ru) + π(NN)] → [π*(bpy)]} transition with MLCT/LLCT transition characters and a {[d   z   2(Ru) + d xy (Ru)] → [π*(NN)]} transition with dominant MLCT transition character, respectively. The calculated phosphorescence of 1 (638 nm) and 2 (731 nm) can be described as originating from a 3 {[d   x   2 – y   2(Ru) + d xy (Ru) + π(NN)] [π*(bpy)]} excited state with 3 MLCT/ 3 LLCT character and a 3 {[d   z   2(Ru) + d   x   2 – y   2(Ru)] [π*(NN)]} excited state with dominantly 3 MLCT character, respectively. The calculated results showed that the modulation of the lowest 3 MLCT excited state of this kind of Ru complexes can be achieved by changing the NN ligand from hydrazone to azine. Moreover, the fact that 2 displays phosphorescence but 1 does not can be interpreted by the different properties of the 3 MLCT excited state: the 3 MLCT excited state of 2 is more than 60 % occupied, whereas that of 1 is less than 20 % ( k r 1  <  k r 2 ). The lowest‐lying excited state of 1 is localized on the bpy ligand, whereas that of 2 lies on the NN ligand, and the nonradiative decay pathways of 1 are easier than those of 2 ( k nr 1  >  k nr 2 ). (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2008)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom