z-logo
Premium
Cobalt and Nickel Oxide Architectures in Metal Carboxylate Frameworks: From Coordination Polymers to 3D Inorganic Skeletons
Author(s) -
Guillou Nathalie,
Livage Carine,
Férey Gérard
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.200600663
Subject(s) - cobalt , nickel , chemistry , metal , oxide , polymer , carboxylate , zinc , inorganic chemistry , polymer chemistry , organic chemistry
This microreview is devoted to the synthesis and properties of nickel and cobalt polycarboxylates, which are classified in terms of the geometries of the organic moieties. It is divided into three main sections — dicarboxylates, tricarboxylates and tetra‐ and hexacarboxylates — and discusses the extreme diversity of these architectures. Numerous topologies can be obtained, ranging from coordination polymers to 3D inorganic skeletons. This microreview begins with the widely studied cobalt succinate system, for which, to date, seven compounds have been reported. Then, examples from malonate to pimelate illustrate the influence of the length of the organic ligand, whereas examples from fumarate to diphenate illustrate the effects of rigidity and complexity. In the same way, examples from trimesate to mellitate show the effects of “multiconnecting” organic partners. These latter seem to disadvantage metal oxide condensation, since the two 3D inorganic frameworks contain linear dicarboxylate ions. On the other hand, 3D nickel oxide skeletons seem to be easier to synthesise than cobalt ones. Moreover, under similar hydrothermal conditions, using cobalt and nickel generally leads to different architectures.(© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2006)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here