z-logo
Premium
A Molecular Tool for Measuring the Electron‐Acceptor Ability of Ligands from Crystallographic Data
Author(s) -
Fanizzi Francesco P.,
Margiotta Nicola,
Lanfranchi Maurizio,
Tiripicchio Antonio,
Pacchioni Gianfranco,
Natile Giovanni
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.200300888
Subject(s) - chemistry , crystallography , ligand (biochemistry) , bite angle , trigonal bipyramidal molecular geometry , acceptor , phenanthroline , denticity , pyridine , molecular orbital , electron acceptor , bipyramid , stereochemistry , molecule , crystal structure , photochemistry , medicinal chemistry , biochemistry , physics , receptor , organic chemistry , condensed matter physics
A method is proposed for the direct measurement of the π‐acidity of ligands coordinated to a metal center. The four‐coordinate complex [PtI 2 (Me 2 ‐phen)] (Me 2 ‐phen = 2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) is unique since it behaves as a molecular trap and, in the presence of a nucleophile (L), one end of it dissociates to allow the L ligand to coordinate trans to the monocoordinated diamine. The coordination of the free end of the phenanthroline is impeded by the filled d orbitals of the metal lying in the same plane as the phenanthroline (d yz and d   z   2electrons assuming as x ‐axis that of the I−Pt−I vector). However, if the L ligand is a π‐acid able to remove electron charge from the yz plane, the second end of the phenanthroline will also be able to interact with platinum. A linear correlation is found between the crystallographic N−Pt−L angle (180° in ideal square‐planar species and 143° in a trigonal bipyramid with a bite angle for bidentate Me 2 ‐phen of 74°) and the π‐acceptor capacity of the L ligand as estimated by ab initio calculations. Alkenes and alkynes are found to be among the best π‐acids and lead to a regular trigonal‐bipyramidal five‐coordinate species. CO appears to be only halfway in between the best π‐acceptor ligands and those with smallest π‐acidity. P‐, S‐, and N‐donor ligands follow in that order without significant differences between sulfides and sulfoxides or between aliphatic amines and pyridine. The very small difference between aliphatic amines and pyridine has been confirmed by investigation of the rate of exchange between the two ends for monocoordinated phenanthroline by 1 H NMR spectroscopy. The activation energy (Δ G ‡ ) was found to be equal, within the experimental error, for the two types of trans ligands. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2004)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here