Premium
Group 10 Metal Complexes of SPS‐Based Pincer Ligands: Syntheses, X‐ray Structures, and DFT Calculations
Author(s) -
Doux Marjolaine,
Mézailles Nicolas,
Ricard Louis,
Le Floch Pascal
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
european journal of inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 1434-1948
DOI - 10.1002/ejic.200300303
Subject(s) - chemistry , pincer movement , intramolecular force , reactivity (psychology) , metathesis , nucleophile , ligand (biochemistry) , diethylamine , medicinal chemistry , palladium , pincer ligand , stereochemistry , oxidative addition , salt metathesis reaction , catalysis , organic chemistry , polymerization , medicine , biochemistry , polymer , alternative medicine , receptor , pathology
The 2,6‐bis(diphenylphosphanylsulfide)phosphinine ( 1 ) reacts with water to afford a 1,2‐dihydrophosphinine oxide 5 featuring a P−H bond. Reaction of 5 with one equivalent of [Pd(COD)Cl 2 ] yields the SPS pincer‐based complex 6 with a P(OH) λ 5 ‐phosphinine central ligand. Complex 6 has been structurally characterized. Two possible mechanisms account for the formation of 5 : an intramolecular P−H to P−Pd metathesis or one based on the P=O to POH equilibrium. Methanol, ethanol or diethylamine also react with 1 to afford the corresponding P(H)(OMe) 7 , P(H)(OEt) 8 , and P(H)(NEt 2 ) 9 λ 5 ‐phosphinines. No definitive mechanism for the formation of 7 − 9 can be proposed since no intermediates were detected in situ by 31 P NMR spectroscopy. However, DFT calculations (at the B3LYP 6‐311+G(d,p) level of theory) suggest that the conversion of 1,2‐dihydrophosphinines into λ 5 ‐phosphinines is not viable because it involves a high activation energy. Like 5 , λ 5 ‐phosphinines 7 and 8 react with [Pd(COD)Cl 2 ] to afford the expected palladium complexes 10 and 11 . An alternative method relies on the reactivity of nucleophiles with a SPS pincer‐based complex 2 featuring a P−Cl bond. (−)‐Menthol and lithium diethylamide react with 2 to yield the expected P‐OMen 13 and P‐NEt 2 14 complexes. Both complexes have been structurally characterized. Bromonickel 18 and chloroplatinum 19 complexes of the SPS ligand, featuring a P−Br or P−Cl bond, have also been prepared by reacting 1 with [NiBr 2 (DME)] and [Pt(COD)Cl 2 ], respectively. Like their palladium congener, both species react with ethanol to afford the corresponding P−OEt derivatives 20 [M = Ni] and 21 [M = Pt]. n Butyl derivatives of these SPS ligands also bind to Ni−Br (complex 22 ) and Pt−Cl (complex 23 ) fragments. Both complexes were straightforwardly prepared by reacting anion 3 , resulting from the reaction of n BuLi with 1 , with the [NiBr 2 (DME)] and [Pt(COD)Cl 2 ] precursors. The chloride ligand is readily substituted by acetonitrile in complexes 4 , 11 , 20 , and 21 upon treatment with AgBF 4 in dichloromethane. Reaction of AgOTf with the palladium complex 4 affords complex 28 via substitution of the chloride ligand by TfO − . The X‐ray crystal structures of the dimethyl‐λ 5 derivative 29 of 1 , and that of its P‐OMe anion 30 , have been recorded. Anion 30 can be regarded as a phosphanyl‐substituted pentadienyl anion. DFT calculations and a charge decomposition analysis (CDA) show that the phosphorus atom in these SPS‐pincer structures is a classical tertiary phosphane ligand in terms of donation and acceptance. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2003)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom