z-logo
Premium
Predictors and prognostic significance of tachycardiomyopathy: insights from a cohort of 1269 patients undergoing atrial flutter ablation
Author(s) -
BrembillaPerrot Béatrice,
Ferreira João Pedro,
Manenti Vladimir,
Sellal Jean Marc,
Olivier Arnaud,
Villemin Thibaut,
Beurrier Daniel,
De Chillou Christian,
Louis Pierre,
Brembilla Alice,
Juillière Yves,
Girerd Nicolas
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1002/ejhf.482
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , cardiology , hazard ratio , heart failure , atrial flutter , confidence interval , cardiomyopathy , odds ratio , radiofrequency ablation , population , atrial fibrillation , ablation , environmental health
Background Atrial flutter‐related tachycardiomyopathy ( AFL‐TCM ) is a rare and treatable cause of heart failure. Little is known about its epidemiology and long‐term prognosis. Our aims are to determine the prevalence, predictors and outcomes of AFL‐TCM . Methods and results A total of 1269 patients were referred for radiofrequency ablation of AFL between January 1996 and September 2014; 184 had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF <40%). At 6 months after AFL ablation, 103 patients (8.1% of the population, 56% of patients with baseline LVEF <40%) had marked LVEF improvement: these were considered to have AFL‐TCM . Patients with persisting reduced LVEF were considered to have systolic dysfunction unrelated to AFL . Patients were followed for a median (percentile 25–75 ) of 1.15 (0.4–2.8) years. Patients with AFL‐TCM were younger, had lower prevalence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy and used less antiarrhythmic drugs than patients with systolic dysfunction unrelated to AFL . In multivariable analysis, ischemic cardiomyopathy [odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval ( CI ) 0.15–0.68) P  = 0.003] and prescription of antiarrhythmic drug before ablation [ OR  = 0.41, 95% CI 0.20–0.84, P  = 0.02] were significantly associated with a lower probability of LVEF improvement during follow‐up. Patients with AFL‐TCM had similar survival to patients without systolic dysfunction at baseline [hazard ratio ( HR ) = 0.96 95% CI 0.34–2.65, P  = 0.929], whereas patients with systolic dysfunction unrelated to AFL had higher mortality rates compared with patients without systolic dysfunction at baseline [ HR  = 2.88, 95% CI 1.45–5.72, P  = 0.002]. Conclusions Marked LVEF improvement was observed in 56% of patients with baseline LVEF <40% at 6 months after ablation. These patients had similar survival to patients without baseline systolic dysfunction, whereas patients who remained with LVEF <40% had a threefold increase in mortality rates.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom