Premium
Serum potassium and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a post‐hoc analysis of the PARAGON‐HF trial
Author(s) -
Ferreira João Pedro,
Claggett Brian L.,
Liu Jiankang,
Desai Akshay S.,
Pfeffer Marc A.,
Anand Inder S.,
van Veldhuisen Dirk J.,
Kober Lars,
Cleland John G.F.,
Rouleau Jean L.,
Packer Milton,
Zile Michael R.,
Shi Victor C.,
Lefkowitz Martin P.,
Shah Sanjiv J.,
Vardeny Orly,
Zannad Faiez,
Solomon Scott D.,
McMurray John J.V.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1002/ejhf.2134
Subject(s) - medicine , heart failure , hazard ratio , valsartan , ejection fraction , cardiology , heart failure with preserved ejection fraction , spironolactone , hyperkalemia , confidence interval , sacubitril, valsartan , renal function , endocrinology , blood pressure
Aims The relationship between serum potassium concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is not well‐established. The aim of this study was to explore the association between serum potassium and clinical outcomes in the PARAGON‐HF trial in which 4822 patients with HFpEF were randomised to treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. Methods and results The relationship between serum potassium concentrations and the primary study composite outcome of total (first and recurrent) heart failure hospitalisations and cardiovascular death was analysed. Hypo‐, normo‐, and hyperkalaemia were defined as serum potassium <4 mmol/L, 4–5 mmol/L and >5 mmol/L, respectively. Both screening and time‐updated potassium (categorical and continuous spline‐transformed) were studied. Patient mean age was 73 years and 52% were women. Patients with higher baseline potassium more often had an ischaemic aetiology and diabetes and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist treatment. Compared with normokalaemia, both time‐updated (but not screening) hypo‐ and hyperkalaemia were associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for hypokalaemia 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30–1.85; P < 0.001, and for hyperkalaemia HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02–1.44; P = 0.025]. Hypokalaemia had a stronger association with a higher risk of all‐cause, cardiovascular and non‐cardiovascular death than hyperkalaemia. The association of hypokalaemia with increased risk of all‐cause and cardiovascular death was most marked in participants with impaired kidney function (interaction P < 0.05). Serum potassium did not significantly differ between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan throughout the follow‐up. Conclusions Both hypo‐ and hyperkalaemia were associated with heart failure hospitalisation but only hypokalaemia was associated with mortality, especially in the context of renal impairment. Hypokalaemia was as strongly associated with death from non‐cardiovascular causes as with cardiovascular death. Collectively, these findings suggest that potassium disturbances are a more of a marker of HFpEF severity rather than a direct cause of death.