Premium
Cardiac output improvement by pecavaptan: a novel dual‐acting vasopressin V1a/V2 receptor antagonist in experimental heart failure
Author(s) -
Mondritzki Thomas,
Mai Thuy Anh,
Vogel Julia,
Pook Elisabeth,
Wasnaire Pierre,
Schmeck Carsten,
Hüser Jörg,
Dinh Wilfried,
Truebel Hubert,
Kolkhof Peter
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1002/ejhf.2001
Subject(s) - tolvaptan , vasopressin , medicine , heart failure , antagonist , receptor antagonist , arginine vasopressin receptor 2 , receptor , vasopressin receptor , endocrinology , vasopressin antagonists , vascular resistance , pharmacology , hemodynamics
Aims Arginine vasopressin (AVP) mediates deleterious effects via vascular V1a and renal V2 receptors in heart failure (HF). Despite positive short‐term decongestive effects in phase II HF studies, selective V2 receptor antagonism has shown no long‐term mortality benefit, potentially related to unopposed V1a receptor activation. We compared the novel dual V1a/V2 receptor antagonist pecavaptan with the selective V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan in pre‐clinical HF models. Methods and results In vitro IC50 determination in recombinant cell lines revealed similar receptor selectivity profiles (V2:V1a) of tolvaptan and pecavaptan for human and dog AVP receptors, respectively. Two canine models were used to compare haemodynamic and aquaretic effects: (i) anaesthetised dogs with tachypacing‐induced HF, and (ii) conscious telemetric dogs with a non‐invasive cardiac output (CO) monitor. Tolvaptan and pecavaptan exhibited no differences in urinary output. In HF dogs, pecavaptan counteracted the AVP‐induced increase in afterload and decrease in CO (pecavaptan: 1.83 ± 0.31 L/min; vs. tolvaptan: 1.46 ± 0.07 L/min, P < 0.05). In conscious telemetric animals, pecavaptan led to a significant increase in CO (+0.26 ± 0.17 L/min, P = 0.0086 vs. placebo), in cardiac index (+0.58 ± 0.39 L/min/m 2 , P = 0.009 vs. placebo) and a significant decrease in total peripheral resistance (−5348.6 ± 3601.3 dyn × s/cm 5 , P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), whereas tolvaptan was without any significant effect. Conclusions Simultaneous blockade of vascular V1a and renal V2 receptors efficiently induces aquaresis and counteracts AVP‐mediated haemodynamic aggravation in HF models. Dual V1a/V2 antagonism may lead to improved outcomes in HF.