Premium
Impact of left atrial diameter on outcome in patients undergoing edge‐to‐edge mitral valve repair: results from the German TRAnscatheter Mitral valve Interventions ( TRAMI ) registry
Author(s) -
Iliadis Christos,
Baldus Stephan,
Kalbacher Daniel,
Boekstegers Peter,
Schillinger Wolfgang,
Ouarrak Taoufik,
Zahn Ralf,
Butter Christian,
Zuern Christine S.,
Bardeleben Ralph Stephan,
Senges Jochen,
Bekeredjian Raffi,
Eggebrecht Holger,
Pfister Roman
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1002/ejhf.1820
Subject(s) - medicine , mitraclip , cardiology , mitral regurgitation , atrial fibrillation , left atrial enlargement , ejection fraction , ventricle , mitral valve , interquartile range , mitral valve repair , heart failure , sinus rhythm
Background Left atrial (LA) dimension is a marker of disease severity and outcome in primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. In transcatheter mitral valve repair, LA enlargement might additionally impact on device handling and technical success through an altered anatomy and atrial annular dilatation. Methods and results Data from the multicentre German TRAnscatheter Mitral valve Interventions registry (TRAMI) were used to analyse the association of baseline LA diameter by tertiles with efficacy, safety and long‐term clinical outcome in patients undergoing edge‐to‐edge repair with MitraClip. In 520 of 843 patients prospectively enrolled in TRAMI, baseline LA diameter were reported [median (interquartile range) LA diameter in tertiles: 44 (40–46) mm, 51 (48–53) mm and 60 (55–66) mm]. Larger LA diameters were significantly associated with secondary aetiology of mitral regurgitation, lower ejection fraction, larger left ventricle, male sex and atrial fibrillation (all P < 0.05). Technical success was not different across tertiles (96%, 95.4% and 98.4%, respectively; P = 0.43) as were major in‐hospital cardiovascular and cerebral adverse events (mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke: 1.8%, 1.2% and 4.4%, respectively; P = 0.11 across tertiles). However, 4‐year mortality significantly increased with larger LA diameter (32.9%, 46.4% and 51.7%, respectively; P < 0.01), as did hospitalization in survivors (60%, 67.6% and 78.9%, respectively; P < 0.05). The association between LA diameter and outcome remained significant after multivariable adjustment including baseline left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter. Conclusion Left atrial enlargement is a strong and independent predictor of adverse long‐term outcome after transcatheter mitral valve repair. Further study is warranted to examine whether timely intervention may have the potential to modify outcome.