Premium
Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on clinical outcomes after left main coronary artery revascularization: results from the randomized EXCEL trial
Author(s) -
Thuijs Daniel J.F.M.,
Milojevic Milan,
Stone Gregg W.,
Puskas John D.,
Serruys Patrick W.,
Sabik Joseph F.,
Dressler Ovidiu,
Crowley Aaron,
Head Stuart J.,
Kappetein A. Pieter
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1002/ejhf.1681
Subject(s) - ejection fraction , medicine , cardiology , conventional pci , myocardial infarction , heart failure , percutaneous coronary intervention , revascularization , coronary artery disease , stroke (engine) , stroke volume , mechanical engineering , engineering
Aim To evaluate the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on 3‐year outcomes in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the EXCEL trial. Methods and results The EXCEL trial randomized patients with LMCAD to PCI with everolimus‐eluting stents ( n = 948) or CABG ( n = 957). Among 1804 patients with known baseline LVEF, 74 (4.1%) had LVEF <40% [heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)], 152 (8.4%) LVEF 40–49% [heart failure with mid‐range ejection fraction (HFmrEF)] and 1578 (87.5%) LVEF ≥50% (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction). Patients with HFrEF vs. HFmrEF vs. preserved LVEF experienced a longer postoperative hospital stay (9.0 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.0 days, P = 0.02) with greater peri‐procedural complications after CABG, while hospital stay after PCI was unaffected by LVEF (1.5 vs. 2.0 vs. 1.0 days, P = 0.20). The composite primary endpoint of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 3 years was 29.3% (PCI) vs. 27.6% (CABG) in patients with HFrEF, 16.2% vs. 15.0% in patients with HFmrEF, and 14.5% vs. 14.6% in those with preserved LVEF, respectively ( P interaction = 0.90). Smoothing spline analysis demonstrated that the 3‐year risk of all‐cause death increased when LVEF decreased, both in patients undergoing CABG and PCI. Conclusion In the EXCEL trial, the composite rate of death, stroke or myocardial infarction at 3 years was significantly higher in patients with HFrEF compared with HFmrEF or preserved LVEF, driven by an increased rate of all‐cause death. No significant differences after PCI vs. CABG were observed among patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and preserved LVEF. Longer‐term follow‐up could provide important insights on differences in clinical outcomes that might emerge over time. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01205776 .