Premium
Sacubitril/valsartan eligibility and outcomes in the ESC‐EORP‐HFA Heart Failure Long‐Term Registry: bridging between European Medicines Agency/Food and Drug Administration label, the PARADIGM‐HF trial, ESC guidelines, and real world
Author(s) -
Kapelios Chris J.,
Lainscak Mitja,
Savarese Gianluigi,
Laroche Cécile,
Seferovic Petar,
Ruschitzka Frank,
Coats Andrew,
Anker Stefan D.,
CrespoLeiro Maria G.,
Filippatos Gerasimos,
Piepoli Massimo F.,
Rosano Giuseppe,
Zanolla Luisa,
Aguiar Carlos,
Murin Jan,
Leszek Przemyslaw,
McDonagh Theresa,
Maggioni Aldo P.,
Lund Lars H.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
european journal of heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.149
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1879-0844
pISSN - 1388-9842
DOI - 10.1002/ejhf.1532
Subject(s) - medicine , heart failure , sacubitril , valsartan , sacubitril, valsartan , ejection fraction , enalapril , guideline , clinical trial , cardiology , intensive care medicine , blood pressure , angiotensin converting enzyme , pathology
Aims To assess the proportion of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are eligible for sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) based on the European Medicines Agency/Food and Drug Administration (EMA/FDA) label, the PARADIGM‐HF trial and the 2016 ESC guidelines, and the association between eligibility and outcomes. Methods and results Outpatients with HFrEF in the ESC‐EORP‐HFA Long‐Term Heart Failure (HF‐LT) Registry between March 2011 and November 2013 were considered. Criteria for LCZ696 based on EMA/FDA label, PARADIGM‐HF and ESC guidelines were applied. Of 5443 patients, 2197 and 2373 had complete information for trial and guideline eligibility assessment, and 84%, 12% and 12% met EMA/FDA label, PARADIGM‐HF and guideline criteria, respectively. Absent PARADIGM‐HF criteria were low natriuretic peptides (21%), hyperkalemia (4%), hypotension (7%) and sub‐optimal pharmacotherapy (74%); absent Guidelines criteria were LVEF>35% (23%), insufficient NP levels (30%) and sub‐optimal pharmacotherapy (82%); absent label criteria were absence of symptoms (New York Heart Association class I). When a daily requirement of ACEi/ARB ≥ 10 mg enalapril (instead of ≥ 20 mg) was used, eligibility rose from 12% to 28% based on both PARADIGM‐HF and guidelines. One‐year heart failure hospitalization was higher (12% and 17% vs. 12%) and all‐cause mortality lower (5.3% and 6.5% vs. 7.7%) in registry eligible patients compared to the enalapril arm of PARADIGM‐HF. Conclusions Among outpatients with HFrEF in the ESC‐EORP‐HFA HF‐LT Registry, 84% met label criteria, while only 12% and 28% met PARADIGM‐HF and guideline criteria for LCZ696 if requiring ≥ 20 mg and ≥ 10 mg enalapril, respectively. Registry patients eligible for LCZ696 had greater heart failure hospitalization but lower mortality rates than the PARADIGM‐HF enalapril group.