Open AccessComparison of inhibition resistance among PCR reagents for detection and quantification of environmental DNA
Author(s) -
Uchii Kimiko,
Doi Hideyuki,
Okahashi Teruyuki,
Katano Izumi,
Yamanaka Hiroki,
Sakata Masayuki K.,
Minamoto Toshifumi
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
environmental dna
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2637-4943
DOI - 10.1002/edn3.37
Subject(s) - environmental dna , reagent , biology , dna , dna extraction , polymerase chain reaction , microbiology and biotechnology , real time polymerase chain reaction , chromatography , chemistry , biochemistry , gene , ecology , biodiversity
Background Real‐time PCR has been widely employed in environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys to detect and quantify target species. The biggest obstacle in real‐time PCR based eDNA assays is the inhibition of PCR amplification that results in false‐negative detection and uncertainty of quantification. Aims Here, we aimed to evaluate inhibition resistance of PCR reagents for detection and quantification of environmental DNA. Materials & Methods We compared six commercial PCR reagents, including four inhibitor‐resistant reagents, for resistance to major PCR inhibitory substances, i.e., humic, fulvic, and tannic acids. Then, we selected three inhibitorresistant reagents to test for their resistance to multiple natural inhibitors using field eDNA samples collected from various habitats. Results We found that each inhibitor‐resistant reagent had its advantage and disadvantage depending on which inhibitory substance was used. Similarly, the inhibitory effects caused by field samples differed among the three inhibitor‐resistant reagents, where none of the reagents consistently showed strong resistance to all field samples. Conclusion Our results indicate that the selection of appropriate PCR reagent would greatly ease PCR inhibition, and consequently improve the estimation of species distribution by real‐time PCR‐based eDNA assays.