Premium
Resource stoichiometry and the biogeochemical consequences of nitrogen deposition in a mixed deciduous forest
Author(s) -
Midgley Meghan G.,
Phillips Richard P.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1002/ecy.1595
Subject(s) - biogeochemical cycle , mineralization (soil science) , ecosystem , nitrogen cycle , nitrification , deciduous , biogeochemistry , ecology , plant litter , microbial population biology , cycling , ecological stoichiometry , environmental chemistry , soil water , litter , nitrate , nitrogen , chemistry , biology , bacteria , history , genetics , organic chemistry , archaeology
Ecosystems often show differential sensitivity to chronic nitrogen (N) deposition; hence, a critical challenge is to improve our understanding of how and why site‐specific factors mediate biogeochemical responses to N enrichment. We examined the extent to which N impacts on soil carbon (C) and N dynamics depend on microbial resource stoichiometry. We added N to forest plots dominated by ectomycorrhizal ( ECM ) trees, which have litter and soil pools rich in organic N and relatively wide C:N ratios, and adjacent forest plots dominated by arbuscular mycorrhizal ( AM ) trees, which have litter and soil pools rich in inorganic N and relatively narrow C:N ratios. While microbes in both plot types exhibited fairly strict biomass homeostasis, microbes in AM ‐ and ECM ‐dominated plots differed in their physiological responses to N addition. Microbes in ECM plots responded to N enrichment by decreasing their investment in N‐acquisition enzymes (relative to C‐acquisition enzymes) and increasing N mineralization rates (relative to C mineralization rates), suggesting that N addition alleviated microbial N demand. In contrast, heterotrophic microbial activities in AM plots were unaffected by N addition, most likely as a result of N‐induced increases in net nitrification (60% increase relative to control plots) and nitrate mobilization (e.g., sixfold increases in mobilization relative to control plots). Combined, our findings suggest the stoichiometric differences between AM and ECM soils are the primary drivers of the observed responses. Plant and microbial communities characterized by wide C:N are more susceptible to N‐induced changes in decomposition and soil C dynamics, whereas communities characterized by narrow C:N are more susceptible to N‐induced nitrate leaching losses. Hence, the biogeochemical consequences of N deposition in temperate forests may be driven by the stoichiometry of the dominant trees and their associated microbes.