z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Move, migrate, or tolerate: Quantifying three tactics for cold‐water fish coping with warm summers in a large river
Author(s) -
Barrett Hannah S.,
Armstrong Jonathan B.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
ecosphere
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.255
H-Index - 57
ISSN - 2150-8925
DOI - 10.1002/ecs2.4095
Subject(s) - tributary , floodplain , fluvial , habitat , fish migration , environmental science , population , climate change , main river , ecology , streams , fishery , riparian zone , hydrology (agriculture) , geography , biology , geology , paleontology , computer network , demography , cartography , geotechnical engineering , structural basin , sociology , computer science
Mainstem rivers are important for provisioning cold‐water fisheries and often support fluvial life histories that grow much larger than resident counterparts in tributaries. However, mainstem rivers are also warmer than tributaries during summer and more tightly coupled to regional climate. A key challenge is to understand how fluvial life histories cope with summer temperatures in mainstem rivers, both now and in a warmer future. Here, we outline three options: tolerance, exploitation of cool microhabitats, or migration to cooler tributaries. We quantified the relative prevalence of these responses in the wild using a Lagrangian approach. Specifically, we used temperature transmitting radio‐tags to track coastal cutthroat trout ( Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii ) habitat use across 100 km of the Willamette River, which exhibited a maximum temperature of 22°C. We found that 89.8% of fish stayed in the mainstem and tolerated high temperatures; 6.5% of the population exploited cool floodplain alcoves; and 3.7% moved into a cool tributary, the McKenzie River. We also found that on average, larger fish opted to use cold‐water refuge habitats rather than tolerate mainstem river temperatures. The expression of all three coping tactics suggests this population has adaptive capacity to respond to future warming. More work is needed to understand how the relative expression of these tactics change depending on the severity of heat stress or nontemperature attributes of mainstem, floodplain, and tributary habitat.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here