Open Access
Evaluating functional recovery of habitat for threatened woodland caribou
Author(s) -
Dickie Melanie,
Serrouya Robert,
DeMars Craig,
Cranston Jerome,
Boutin Stan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ecosphere
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.255
H-Index - 57
ISSN - 2150-8925
DOI - 10.1002/ecs2.1936
Subject(s) - woodland caribou , vegetation (pathology) , threatened species , woodland , predation , ecology , habitat , population , predator , restoration ecology , environmental science , geography , biology , medicine , demography , pathology , sociology
Abstract Habitat restoration is a core element for the recovery of many declining species. In western Canada, habitat restoration for the recovery of woodland caribou is focused on linear features ( LF s) created by oil and gas exploration. At present, the only established criterion for LF restoration is when vegetation structure on LF s is similar to surrounding vegetation. Human‐mediated habitat alteration impacts caribou population dynamics by increasing caribou predation rates in two ways: increasing alternate prey populations leading to higher predator numbers and increasing predator hunting efficiency. Linear features increase the movement rates—and may thus increase hunting efficiency—of wolves, a primary predator of caribou and a main hypothesized mechanism for population declines. One approach to determine LF recovery is to identify potential thresholds in the characteristics of regenerating LF s where efficiencies in wolf movement rates are no longer evident. We examined how vegetation affects wolf selection of, and movement on, LF s in northeastern Alberta using five‐minute Global Positioning System locations from 20 wolves. Wolves selected LF s with shorter vegetation and traveled faster on LF s with shorter, sparser vegetation and increased vegetation variability. Travel speeds were reduced by 1.5–1.7 km/h when vegetation exceeded heights of 0.50 m, but at least 30% of a LF required vegetation exceeding 4.1 m to slow movement rates to those traveled while in forest. Policy implications: Most of the movement efficiency afforded to wolves by LF s is mediated when vegetation exceeds 0.50 m, and therefore, active restoration could be focused in areas that have not met this value. Rather than treating this value as a clear threshold equating to functional recovery, multiple metrics across trophic levels must also be evaluated to assess population recovery for caribou.