z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Can coyote predation risk induce reproduction suppression in white‐tailed deer?
Author(s) -
Cherry Michael J.,
Morgan Keri E.,
Rutledge Brandon T.,
Conner L. Mike,
Warren Robert J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ecosphere
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.255
H-Index - 57
ISSN - 2150-8925
DOI - 10.1002/ecs2.1481
Subject(s) - odocoileus , predation , fecundity , biology , ecology , semelparity and iteroparity , reproduction , population , reproductive success , predator , zoology , demography , sociology
Abstract Predators can have powerful nonconsumptive effects on their prey by inducing behavioral, physiological, and morphological responses. These nonconsumptive effects may influence prey demography if they decrease birthrates or increase susceptibility to other sources of mortality. The Reproductive Suppression Model suggests that iteroparous species may maximize their lifetime reproductive success by suppressing their reproduction until a future time, when conditions may be more favorable. Coyote ( Canis latrans ) range expansion in the United States has exposed white‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) populations to increased predation risk, and coyote predation can have profound effects on white‐tailed deer reproductive success. We evaluated effects of temporal variation in predation risk (i.e., coyote–deer ratios) on fecundity and reproductive success of white‐tailed deer on the Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center in southwestern Georgia, United States, by exploiting a rapid decline in coyote abundance to establish a natural experiment. We measured fecundity by examining ovaries for evidence of ovulation, and measured reproductive success using evidence of lactation from deer harvested before and after the decline in coyote abundance. We found that incidence of ovulation and lactation increased following the decline in predation risk. Our results suggest coyotes may be able to influence deer recruitment, independent of direct predation, through interactions that result in reduced fecundity. More broadly, our study suggests that in order to understand the totality of the effect of predators on prey population dynamics, studies should incorporate measures of direct and indirect predator effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here