Premium
Effects of land‐cover changes on the partitioning of surface energy and water fluxes in Amazonia using high‐resolution satellite imagery
Author(s) -
Oliveira Gabriel,
Brunsell Nathaniel A.,
Moraes Elisabete C.,
Shimabukuro Yosio E.,
Santos Thiago V.,
Randow Celso,
Aguiar Renata G.,
Aragao Luiz E.O.C.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ecohydrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.982
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1936-0592
pISSN - 1936-0584
DOI - 10.1002/eco.2126
Subject(s) - environmental science , evapotranspiration , land cover , albedo (alchemy) , amazon rainforest , biosphere , deforestation (computer science) , atmospheric sciences , hydrology (agriculture) , spatial variability , advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer , land use , remote sensing , geology , digital elevation model , ecology , art , statistics , geotechnical engineering , mathematics , performance art , computer science , programming language , biology , art history
Spatial variability of surface energy and water fluxes at local scales is strongly controlled by soil and micrometeorological conditions. Thus, the accurate estimation of these fluxes from space at high spatial resolution has the potential to improve prediction of the impact of land‐use changes on the local environment. In this study, Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and Large‐Scale Biosphere‐Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia (LBA) data were used to examine the partitioning of surface energy and water fluxes over different land‐cover types in one wet year (2004) and one drought year (2005) in eastern Rondonia state, Brazil. The spatial variation of albedo, net radiation ( Rn ), soil ( G ) and sensible ( H ) heat fluxes, evapotranspiration ( ET ), and evaporative fraction ( EF ) were primarily related to the lower presence of forest (primary [PF] or secondary [SF]) in the western side of the Ji‐Parana River in comparison with the eastern side, located within the Jaru Biological Reserve protected area. Water limitation in this part of Amazonia tends to affect anthropic (pasture [PA] and agriculture [AG]) ecosystems more than the natural land covers (PF and SF). We found statistically significant differences on the surface fluxes prior to and ~1 year after the deforestation. Rn over forested areas is ~10% greater in comparison with PA and AG. Deforestation and consequent transition to PA or AG increased the total energy (~200–400%) used to heat the soil subsurface and raise air temperatures. These differences in energy partitioning contributed to approximately three times higher ET over forested areas in comparison with nonforested areas. The conversion of PF to AG is likely to have a higher impact in the local climate in this part of Amazonia when compared with the change to PA and SF, respectively. These results illustrate the importance of conserving secondary forest areas in Amazonia.