z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Wildfire‐induced short‐term changes in a small mammal community increase prevalence of a zoonotic pathogen?
Author(s) -
Ecke Frauke,
Nematollahi Mahani Seyed Alireza,
Evander Magnus,
Hörnfeldt Birger,
Khalil Hussein
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
ecology and evolution
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.17
H-Index - 63
ISSN - 2045-7758
DOI - 10.1002/ece3.5688
Subject(s) - mammal , pathogen , term (time) , marine mammal , biology , ecology , zoonotic disease , environmental health , geography , zoology , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , disease , physics , pathology , quantum mechanics
Natural disturbances like droughts and fires are important determinants of wildlife community structure and are suggested to have important implications for prevalence of wildlife-borne pathogens. After a major wildfire affecting >1,600 ha of boreal forest in Sweden in 2006, we took the rare opportunity to study the short-term response (2007-2010 and 2015) of small mammal community structure, population dynamics, and prevalence of the Puumala orthohantavirus (PUUV) hosted by bank voles ( Myodes glareolus ). We performed snap-trapping in permanent trapping plots in clear-cuts ( n  = 3), unburnt reference forests ( n  = 7), and the fire area ( n  = 7) and surveyed vegetation and habitat structure. Small mammal species richness was low in all habitats (at maximum three species per trapping session), and the bank vole was the only small mammal species encountered in the fire area after the first postfire year. In autumns of years of peak rodent densities, the trapping index of bank voles was lowest in the fire area, and in two of three peak-density years, it was highest in clear-cuts. Age structure of bank voles varied among forest types with dominance of overwintered breeders in the fire area in the first postfire spring. PUUV infection probability in bank voles was positively related to vole age. Infection probability was highest in the fire area due to low habitat complexity in burnt forests, which possibly increased encounter rate among bank voles. Our results suggest that forest fires induce cascading effects, including fast recovery/recolonization of fire areas by generalists like bank voles, impoverished species richness of small mammals, and altered prevalence of a rodent-borne zoonotic pathogen. Our pilot study suggests high human infection risk upon encountering a bank vole in the fire area, however, with even higher overall risk in unburnt forests due to their higher vole numbers.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here